08-10-2007, 07:53
|
|
|
|
חבר מתאריך: 19.09.05
הודעות: 1,280
|
|
1Even in a perfect world, training time will always be limited. Specialization comes at a price. The more time spent training on a specific delivery, the less time available for core infantry fighting skills. An army like the IDF with a limited budget and that needs to be able to fight intensive wars during brief periods cannot afford to have various very-specialized infantry brigades. As I keep quoting Offer, the units that will usually be deployed in war are the one that are closest and available, rather than the one specially trained for the mission
Even a large nation like the US which can afford various "specialized" amphibious, parachute, helicopter and mechanized varieties of infantry ends up in war using them in a manner far different than their specialty. Think of the 1st Marine Division and the 101 (or was it 82?) Airborne units that were deployed as mechinized infantry during the 2003 invasion of Iraq and both lacked sufficient armored mobility (the Marines employing their Amphibious AAA7 as large APCs hundreds of miles from any beachfront
I would much rather have infantry units which are primarily excellent at general fighting skills (urban, trench, etc) and only have some experience with various delivery methods (helicoptor, APC, amphibious) than the other way around
2Actually I think that a more severe problem that we saw in the last war was the tanks soldiers who hadn't seen a tank even once in 4 months
_____________________________________
Sorry for the English... I was a bad student in Hebrew school
אבל אפשר לענות לי בעברית
|