ועוד משהו.
אם אתה טוען שזה לא נכון שיהיו מגבלות על קינפוג ושליטה וכל מה שנכתב באשכול המקורי
אז אני ממליץ לך לפנות לויקיפדיה שמשם הובאו הדברים, אתר שבו גולשים מליוני הייטקיסטים ומביני עניין כמוך
שבאופן תמוה לא ראו צורך לתקן את "הטעויות" שאתה טוען שקיימות שם:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truste...usted_Computing

מי יודע, אולי רוס אנדרסון, מדען מחשבים ויועץ אבטחה במקצועו, גם לא מבין כלום כמוני...
אבל זה מה שהוא אומר:

ציטוט:

The Cambridge cryptographer Ross Anderson has great concerns that "TC can support remote censorship [...] In general, digital objects created using TC systems remain under the control of their creators, rather than under the control of the person who owns the machine on which they happen to be stored (as at present) [...] So someone who writes a paper that a court decides is defamatory can be compelled to censor it — and the software company that wrote the word processor could be ordered to do the deletion if she refuses. Given such possibilities, we can expect TC to be used to suppress everything from pornography to writings that criticise political leaders."[16] He goes on to state that: [...] software suppliers can make it much harder for you to switch to their competitors' products. At a simple level, Word could encrypt all your documents using keys that only Microsoft products have access to; this would mean that you could only read them using Microsoft products, not with any competing word processor. [...] The [...] most important benefit for Microsoft is that TC will dramatically increase the costs of switching away from Microsoft products (such as Office) to rival products (such as OpenOffice). For example, a law firm that wants to change from Office to OpenOffice right now merely has to install the software, train the staff and convert their existing files. In five years' time, once they have received TC-protected documents from perhaps a thousand different clients, they would have to get permission (in the form of signed digital certificates) from each of these clients in order to migrate their files to a new platform. The law firm won't in practice want to do this, so they will be much more tightly locked in, which will enable Microsoft to hike its prices.[16] Anderson summarizes the case by saying "The fundamental issue is that whoever controls the TC infrastructure will acquire a huge amount of power. Having this single point of control is like making everyone use the same bank, or the same accountant, or the same lawyer. There are many ways in which this power could be abused."[16]