
02-06-2025, 14:52
|
|
|
|
חבר מתאריך: 01.08.10
הודעות: 1,059
|
|
|
בהחלט כן
יש אין סוף מאמרים בנושא. אחד מהם:
https://blog.primaryarms.com/guide/...-vs-gas-piston/
בקשר לאלמנט דיוק, בהתייחס לטענה ש Di יותר מדויקים, בערד הקנה צף, משפר את הדיוק בהשוואה לאחרים ללא תכונה זו.
ו.. גם ניתוח האינטליגנציה המלאכותית של גוגל
:
AI Overview
Learn more
Modern assault rifles, particularly AR-15 based platforms, increasingly favor short-stroke piston systems over direct impingement (DI) for several reasons: increased reliability, cleaner operation, and potentially smoother recoil. While DI is more common and simpler, piston systems offer advantages, particularly in consistent ammunition performance and reduced fouling.
Here's a more detailed look:
Increased Reliability:
Piston systems are less susceptible to ammunition variations and can often run reliably with a wider range of ammunition types, a key advantage in certain military and tactical applications.
Cleaner Operation:
Piston systems generally run cleaner than DI, as the operating rod, not the propellant gases, cycles the bolt, reducing fouling in the receiver and reducing the need for frequent cleaning.
Smoother Recoil:
Short-stroke pistons, while not universally smooth, can often provide a smoother shooting experience compared to DI, particularly in rapid fire scenarios.
Retrofitted Design:
Short-stroke piston systems are relatively easy to retrofit into existing AR-15 platforms, making them a popular choice for conversion or upgrade.
Potential for Carrier Tilt:
A potential downside of short-stroke systems is "carrier tilt," where the bolt carrier can tilt slightly during operation, requiring special design elements to mitigate this.
נערך לאחרונה ע"י aw1 בתאריך 02-06-2025 בשעה 15:13.
|